One Nation, One Election – An Indispensable Perspective
The concept of “One Nation, One Election” has emerged as a significant discourse in the evolution of Indian democracy. It envisions synchronizing elections for both the Parliament and State Assemblies, allowing voters across the country to cast their votes simultaneously. Auditor S. Gurumurthy emphasized this necessity during the 55th anniversary event of Thuglak magazine.
Historical Context
In his speech, Gurumurthy highlighted that until 1967, India conducted elections for both the Parliament and State Assemblies simultaneously. However, due to various political and administrative needs, this practice was discontinued, and separate elections were introduced. Revisiting this unified approach, he argued, could lead to several benefits:
- Efficiency in Time and Resources
Conducting elections requires significant expenditure from taxpayers and considerable time from the Election Commission. Implementing “One Nation, One Election” could save these critical resources. - Political Stability
Frequent elections disrupt the continuity of governance and the implementation of long-term development policies. A unified electoral cycle would provide administrative stability and ensure governments can function uninterrupted for their full tenure.
Political Dynamics and Opposition
Gurumurthy also addressed the current political climate, where the idea faces resistance simply because the ruling BJP is advocating it. He remarked that such opposition often arises from political polarization rather than objective assessment.
- Reasons for Opposition
- Concerns that “One Nation, One Election” might centralize power, undermining the federal structure.
- A belief that the distinct political identity of states could be diluted.
- Is It Feasible?
- The differing tenures of state assemblies and the Parliament pose a practical challenge to synchronization.
- Constitutional amendments would be required to align the election schedules.
The Need for Consensus
Gurumurthy also praised political figures like Seeman for challenging long-held narratives in Tamil Nadu politics. He compared Seeman’s approach to that of Cho Ramaswamy, who, through Thuglak, spearheaded a movement of political critique. This reflects the growing demand for a pragmatic approach in addressing complex governance issues, including electoral reforms.
A Broader Perspective
The debate around “One Nation, One Election” is a pivotal one for India. It requires an in-depth analysis of its legal, economic, and social implications. If implemented thoughtfully, it could transform the electoral landscape, ensuring stability and efficiency in governance.
Discussion about this post